Skip to main content

What type of relationship do people use the app Tinder for?

 woman wearing black sweater holding hand with man wearing gray suit jacket

Why are so many people on Tinder? Sex. Pure and simple. Not that everyone would admit to that of course: according to the Big Tinder Project carried out in 2015 there are no less than thirteen different motives for people being on Tinder, with the most popular being amusement. The rest ranged from curiosity, to an ego boost, socializing and even finding love came in at number four. Casual sex only ranked at number eleven. But if we really explore the desires behind these reasons they all stem from the same basic need: to enjoy attention from someone of your preferred sexual orientation. It may be true that not all flirting leads to intercourse, but no one could deny the kick we get out of interacting with someone we find sexually attractive. Because if it was our conversation we wanted to be stimulating, we would just talk to our friends right?

Recent data has revealed that Tinder has 57 million users across the globe, is available in 40 languages and is accessible in 190 countries. It processes over one billion swipes per day and Tinder users go on one million dates every week. No one could convince me that every single one of those dates will lead to a loving relationship, or that even 10% of them will. Tinder is so prolific because it has successfully combined the most primal human desire with the convenience and range of options that combing the city streets and bars after nightfall can’t really manage. Take nightclubbing as an example of Tinder in real life – young people hit the club with their friends claiming they want to have a few drinks, have a bit of dance and just let their hair down. It is rarely admitted, especially by women, that they are there because they want to pick someone up. So why do we all make so much effort to look good when we go out? It is hard to make a deep meaningful connection with someone in a sweaty nightclub with pounding music and dim lighting, just as it is talking to someone online without seeing them face to face. In both instances people put on a desirable physical façade because they know that is what everyone else is looking for, in other words they want to create and feel sexual attraction.

Tinder has allowed the population something which for so long was not possible; sex on tap, without fear of serious recrimination. It has been argued that men are more into these casual encounters than women, heralding the stereotype that men only want sex whereas women are always on the lookout for love and commitment. While it may be true that Tinder has more male users than female ones, and that 91% of women claimed that they only swiped right on profiles they were truly attracted to in comparison with 72% of men, one only has to look at the TV shows being made now and the songs currently high up in the charts to see that women are similarly obsessed with sex. There is no longer so much shame and stigma attached to female sexuality, and the Tinder craze is clear evidence that they are providing a much sought-after service. Plus, one has to consider that this aforementioned shame could be why certain women feel they have to be legitimately interested in their Tinder matches and still struggle to admit that they just want to have sex. Perhaps being able to swipe freely will be the liberation we have craved for so long.

Tinder’s biggest critics have called it the end of intimacy and decry the lack of real physical connection in modern relationships. But who really cares if it is? Courting and marriage back in the good old days was hardly the chivalrous display of sentiment and romance we have been led to believe. A few decades ago boy met girl, the onus was on him to ask her out on a date, and then a few weeks he would inevitably have to pop the question, if only out of sheer desperation to get his leg over. She would have little choice but to accept (because God forbid she might get left on the shelf and become an embittered old spinster), they got married and would have to stay together until one of them died. Divorce was inaccessible unless you were rich, and woe betide you if you fell pregnant out of wedlock. Call me cynical, but what about this is better than being able to try before you buy, so to speak? Dating apps are representative of a new kind of freedom that changing societal attitudes and advancing technology have granted the younger generations. The shackles of propriety have officially been vanquished and people can live the life they choose, regardless of sexual orientation or feeling pressurised by old fashioned gender norms. Of course people may look for something more serious on these apps, but love is often an accidental by-product of these hook ups. And why does that matter really? What is about having consensual intimate relations with a number of different people that is inherently worse than feeling obligated to marry someone just because you saw them naked?

What this argument essentially boils down to is two of the biggest drivers of humanity: sex and money. Being able to get one without having to let go of a large amount of the other seems like a pretty sweet deal. Ultimately that is why people use Tinder and others of its ilk – it really is a tale as old as time. Our motivations are often simplistic and swiping right gives us the same thrill we experience when we get paid or promoted. It’s instant gratification with a satisfying pay off, and I for one cannot envision a day when this will no longer be popular.

 

 

 

Comments