Skip to main content

'I May Destroy You' and lessons on consent

woman sits on the bar

I have just finished watching Michaela Coel's magnificent 12 part series I May Destroy You, and while it is rare for television shows to live up to such extraordinary hype, this one certainly does. It has everything that excellent TV in recent years has incorporated and uses them to make something completely new. The story centres around London-based writer Arabella who is spiked and sexually assaulted on a night out, taking a simple whodunnit premise and forcing the viewer to confront the thorniest and most controversial issues that we now face. It's hard for TV to shock these days, as sex and drugs and crime pepper our most prolific shows, yet Coel has managed to shed light on all those drak tricky parts that the entertainment industry - indeed society as a whole - likes to ignore, giving us the perspective we have been lacking for so long. To completely dissect the show would be to spoil it for those who have not yet watched, but in a post MeToo world it still feels fresh, unique, and above all necessary.

For starters, Arabella is not the 'perfect victim'. She does not embody the qualities our culture associates with the ideal pure, innocent woman, the kind we imagine would have been mistreated and abused by men. She gets drunk, uses recreational drugs, has casual sex with inappropriate men, leaves her work deadlines to the last minute - in other words she is us. Her experience mirrors the lives we lead, the freedoms we love, and also the world that we fear. Because this could be us. Our cheeky night out could descend into terror without us ever realising the full extent of it. Even if it is clear a crime has been committed the chances of an attacker even being identified, let alone serving time in prison, remain extremely slim. Closure becomes an illusion. The victims of these crimes are the ones who must serve the sentence as our society continually chooses to focus on their actions rather than those of the perpetrator. What were they wearing? Had they been drinking? Did they already have a relationship with their supposed assailant? If someone leaves their car parked on their street overnight and it is broken into, is their integrity ever questioned for one second? Well, what did they expect, leaving it outside like that? It shouldn't have looked so nice. They should have known someone would try to steal it.

Rape is rarely as clear cut as a woman being dragged off the street violently by a deranged stranger in a dark alleyway. Many attackers are known to their victims, possibly even someone they have consensually slept with before. A form of rape highlighted by the show is stealthing; two partners have consensual sex with a condom only for the partner wearing the condom to remove it during the act without the other person knowing. It is an undeniable abuse of trust, as well as potentially exposing the victim to serious diseases and unwanted pregnancy. But it also illustrates the main motivation for rapists - power. If there is anything that stealthing proves it is what those in the know have been trying to explain for years. It is a common misconception that rapists and abusers do what they do for sexual gratification, and in a way this is true, but they are not driven by their attraction to their victim. What they want is for them to be completely and inescapably submissive, totally under their control. A stealther is able to have consensual sex with their partner, yet this is not enough to satisfy that need for domination over the other person. We are not taught about this in schools. We have never seen this before on television. Many victims may not ever know a crime has been committed - even the perpetrator may view removing a condom as merely ridding themselves of an inconvenience. In I May Destroy You we are finally allowed to see it for what it really is.

Through the character of Arabella Coel takes us on a journey navigating the minefield of sexual assault; how consent and trust can be abused, the process of reporting it to the police, how her employers react to the news, and every trial that comes along the way. The focus expands throughout the show to confront the issues that the BIPOC community, women and the LGBTQIA community must deal with on a daily basis, from the microaggressions to the blatant abuse. It is easy to see why so many choose not to report these crimes when they are forced to relive that experience in police interviews, have every inch of their body scoured for evidence, and are far too often left disappointed by the lack of a conviction or even any strong leads. The flashbacks in the show help to contextualise her story, but more significantly they convey how every confrontation we have with abuse and mistrust and deception leave an imprint on our psyche. I do not wish to say more for fear of giving too much away but while we may still struggle to rectify these wrongs in our society, there is hope we can start to have more conversations about what we show, what we watch and who should be writing it. Because Michaela Coel is a voice we need right now.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Crowds discouraged from gathering for Prince Philip (South West Londoner)

  The govern ment have asked people not to gather in crowds or leave flowers for Prince Philip due to the Covid-19 risk. People have been gathering and leaving tributes outside Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle since his death was announced earlier today. Royal security guards at Windsor Castle have said that the flowers outside will be cleared this evening and brought into the courtyard for the Royal Family and the Queen to see. Floral tributes outside Windsor Castle They said the family love seeing displays but they would not be able to come out and see anyone due to the coronavirus regulations. The official notice of his death has been removed from the front gates of Buckingham Palace after large crowds gathered to pay their respects. The Two Brewers pub next to Windsor Castle has pictures of Prince Philip in the window The Royal Family have also urged the public to stick to the coronavirus guidelines. A statement from a Cabinet Office spokesperson said: “Although this is an ...

Choice and Control: The Dilemmas of Regulating Drug Use (Pi Media)

Giving you the insight into matters directly related to student life is the Pi Comment column, Spotlight: UCL, Universities and Young People, where our team of columnists tackle the issues affecting students today. Cathy Meyer-Funnel makes the case for freedom of choice in the face of overbearing drug use measures in universities. Drug use on university campuses is, for many students, an accepted part of their experience, whether they are users or not. It has never been legal, yet particularly in large cities such as London it is hard to know how preventative measures would really be effective. Presumably this is why universities such as Manchester, Newcastle and Sussex have decided to take an alternative approach by offering drug testing kits to their students, enabling them to test the toxicity of their illegal substances and thereby make a more informed decision about what exactly they are putting in their bodies. According to NUS vice-president for welfare Eva Crossan Jory, “M...

A plea for medium fashion

 This is not an article in the traditional sense. It is not an argument but rather a plea, a crying out for us to find a solution to a problem that seems to be dividing the fashion world. Neither side has currently offered up a feasible fix, yet their greatly opposing stances on this issue has only caused shoppers and fashion fans like me to feel even more guilty and confused about what I should be buying and wearing. What I'm talking about is slow vs. fast fashion. Fast fashion is one of those uncomfortable truths that has always existed on the periphery of our consciousness; we always knew deep down that the people who made our clothes didn't have the happiest lives or earn the most money, yet we managed to push it down. It happened in a far away place, it wasn't our fault, it was probably exaggerated or inaccurate information. But this year the Boohoo factory scandal in Leicester  made it harder for us to ignore it. All this negative publicity might have been the first s...