Skip to main content

National Leaders Convene At UCL For Groundbreaking Climate Change Conference (Pi Media)

Hundreds of scholars and students alike attended the conference, which focused on the need to “adapt” to climate change rather than prevent it.
On Friday 16th November a packed Jeffery Hall gave host to UCL Climate Action Society’s flagship event, the Sustainability Symposium. The conference brought together speakers from a variety of fields, all with the shared aim of raising awareness of an impending climate catastrophe and discussing how to reduce the most harmful human impacts around the globe.
President of the Climate Action Society, Aliza Ayaz, began proceedings addressing the need for an “intellectual approach”, in order to avoid the “frenzy” that has become associated with action on climate change. Her opening speech outlined how climate change affects both developed and developing countries, yet can be especially damaging to poor and vulnerable communities. She stated that “there can be no lasting peace without climate action,” and emphasised the need to focus efforts not just in the field of academia and research but across many other different areas of society such as law, politics, and business.
Following Ayaz was Richard Jackson, the Director of Sustainability at UCL. His ten-person team work to embed sustainability across all university activities, as well as increasing the sense of community amongst the UCL student and staff body in order to help tackle climate change together. Campaigns such as ‘Ditch the Disposable’ are currently helping the university reach their target of 85% recycling rates, while the ‘Wild Bloomsbury’ project seeks to create more green spaces on campus and reduce the environmental impact that comes with city living. Jackson placed special emphasis on the “need for honesty” and the importance of “increasing community participation” in order to make action on climate change a social responsibility for everyone. Despite the 14% carbon reduction on the UCL campus over the past decade, Jackson made clear that more must still be done.
The first guest speaker to address the audience was Rupert Read, a Green Party MP candidate and chair of the think tank Green House, who delivered an emphatic message on the “partial or complete collapse of civilisation” due to climate change. Building on the importance of being honest when discussing the realities of this phenomenon, he called for drastic action to be taken in the form of protesting and refusing to accept how governments and politicians have dealt with – or failed to deal with – climate change. He claimed that our generation will not live to grow old unless “something drastic” is done, and pointed towards serious action in the form of decommissioning nuclear power plants and labelling government ministers “criminals against humanity” for their inability to tackle these problems decisively.
The next speaker, Renee Ayeen Karunungan, a climate tracker and climate campaigner at the UN Paris summit, discussed the relationship between sustainability and art. Her stance on the political nature of art demonstrated how it can be used as a form of protest, especially in relation to the argument against the sponsorship of art galleries by large oil companies and other major pollutants. As she stated, “art may not change the world, but it can change the way we view the world.”
Senior curator at the ZSL, Paul Pearce-Kelly, used his platform to cast light on the ecological impact on the marine environment, in particular coral reefs. As 2018 is International Year of the Reef, Pearce-Kelly stressed the importance of coral reefs in a marine ecosystem, and the impending threat of the “sixth mass extinction” if the destruction of such species continues. His sentiments were echoed by UCL Physical Geography Professor Anson Mackay, whose talk explored the contribution of habitat loss and over-exploitation of natural resources to the climate catastrophe. He called on the student population to get more involved, whether by voting or even just paying more attention to events unfolding around them. Speaking to Pi Media, Professor Mackay reiterated the need to “raise awareness about all the various issues linked to climate change” and said that the approach needed is one of “tackling them one by one”, on both an individual and collective level.
Professor Mackay was followed by Dr Morgan Phillips, co-director of the Glacier Trust, a charity helping vulnerable communities in the Himalayas adapt to climate change. He too expressed the need for adaption, something that only 0.89% of academic articles on climate change analysed in the last year have focussed on. He pointed out that humans are very good at “maladaptation” – temporarily fixing a problem with no real permanent solution. In an interview with Pi Media, he called on students to spread the “positive stories about great projects” doing work against climate change, as “it is the collective action that will make the difference”.
The conference ended on a note of optimism with Joss Garman, UK Initiative Director at the European Climate Foundation. Garman pointed towards some of the positive changes that have already been implemented, such as the phasing out of coal as a power source in the UK. He said there were “reasons to be hopeful”, for instance the projections for electric cars to be rolled out, and the “fast paced nature of technological change”, enabling developing economies to progress in different ways without relying on industry.
The overall message of the symposium suggests that the debate surrounding climate change has shifted – if it can no longer be prevented from happening, then its effects must be minimised. One of the recurring themes of the conference was the importance of student involvement, and the responsibilities that lie with the generation that will inherit these issues.
Thanks to UCL Climate Action Society for putting on the Sustainability Symposium.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Crowds discouraged from gathering for Prince Philip (South West Londoner)

  The govern ment have asked people not to gather in crowds or leave flowers for Prince Philip due to the Covid-19 risk. People have been gathering and leaving tributes outside Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle since his death was announced earlier today. Royal security guards at Windsor Castle have said that the flowers outside will be cleared this evening and brought into the courtyard for the Royal Family and the Queen to see. Floral tributes outside Windsor Castle They said the family love seeing displays but they would not be able to come out and see anyone due to the coronavirus regulations. The official notice of his death has been removed from the front gates of Buckingham Palace after large crowds gathered to pay their respects. The Two Brewers pub next to Windsor Castle has pictures of Prince Philip in the window The Royal Family have also urged the public to stick to the coronavirus guidelines. A statement from a Cabinet Office spokesperson said: “Although this is an ...

Choice and Control: The Dilemmas of Regulating Drug Use (Pi Media)

Giving you the insight into matters directly related to student life is the Pi Comment column, Spotlight: UCL, Universities and Young People, where our team of columnists tackle the issues affecting students today. Cathy Meyer-Funnel makes the case for freedom of choice in the face of overbearing drug use measures in universities. Drug use on university campuses is, for many students, an accepted part of their experience, whether they are users or not. It has never been legal, yet particularly in large cities such as London it is hard to know how preventative measures would really be effective. Presumably this is why universities such as Manchester, Newcastle and Sussex have decided to take an alternative approach by offering drug testing kits to their students, enabling them to test the toxicity of their illegal substances and thereby make a more informed decision about what exactly they are putting in their bodies. According to NUS vice-president for welfare Eva Crossan Jory, “M...

A plea for medium fashion

 This is not an article in the traditional sense. It is not an argument but rather a plea, a crying out for us to find a solution to a problem that seems to be dividing the fashion world. Neither side has currently offered up a feasible fix, yet their greatly opposing stances on this issue has only caused shoppers and fashion fans like me to feel even more guilty and confused about what I should be buying and wearing. What I'm talking about is slow vs. fast fashion. Fast fashion is one of those uncomfortable truths that has always existed on the periphery of our consciousness; we always knew deep down that the people who made our clothes didn't have the happiest lives or earn the most money, yet we managed to push it down. It happened in a far away place, it wasn't our fault, it was probably exaggerated or inaccurate information. But this year the Boohoo factory scandal in Leicester  made it harder for us to ignore it. All this negative publicity might have been the first s...